Talk:Francis M. Fesmire

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Hang On edit

This article is about a prominent American emergency physician. He has a Wiki entry in Dutch already: [1] It is time there is one in English. I think perhaps the article needs to have more neutrality and needs to be cleaned up, but should not be deleted in my opinion. I am also an emergency physician. GauravGMa —Preceding undated comment added 19:48, 26 September 2010 (UTC).Reply

While I think that it is quite valid to ask about Notability, and goodness knows the ref's need to be done correctly, I think describing this as spam is going a bit far. While three of the recent edits have been by a person with a handle that appears to be the subject of the page (Ffesmire), they seem OK by the standards of WP:AB. I really don't think it rates a speedy G11.

Seriously? It's pure hagiography and reads like something from his or an employer's website. – ukexpat (talk) 14:13, 24 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

This is so full of WIN! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.73.55.10 (talk) 18:23, 23 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Francis M. Fesmire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:44, 27 November 2017 (UTC)Reply