This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Dakota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of South Dakota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South DakotaWikipedia:WikiProject South DakotaTemplate:WikiProject South DakotaSouth Dakota articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
A fact from Fossil Cycad National Monument appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 February 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
Latest comment: 11 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion
I don't know enough of cycads to make an athoritative article here, but I did notice some innacuracies in describing cycads. First of all, cycads were described as "fern-like". This comparison should only be used carefully, since it seems to suggest cycads are related to ferns. (They are not.) Second, the article, near the end, speaks of cycad fruits and flowers. Cycads, being coniferous, cannot have flowers, nor can they have fruits, I believe. (Although their seeds can be encased in what looks rather like a fruit.) Yew arils are confused similarly. I don't know the proper terminology for cycad seeds, but by flowers, I assume the source meant male and female cones. Vlmastra 21:56, 6 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. Let me check that out. --Rbraunwa 22:59, 6 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
My sources use the terminology I adopted here, but the "flowers" come from a 1930 nontechnical NPS publication that even shows a reconstructed "flower". Would that be what a mature cycad cone looks like? Anyway, I took out that sentence since I can't say just what it means now. Thanks again for catching it. --Rbraunwa 23:13, 6 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
Oddly enough, the "cycads" of Fossil Cycad National Monument were not cycads, but cycadeoids. See for example Wieland 1916 (Wieland, G. R. 1916. American fossil cycads. Volume II. Taxonomy. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington D. C. Publication Number 34.) - all of the "Minnekahta" species (another name for the site) are species of Cycadeoidea. 207.224.82.17 (talk) 17:46, 26 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
