Talk:Forrest Griffin vs. Stephan Bonnar

not too sure about how to use wikipedia, so maybe another more experienced user can fix this for me. My issue is with the last line in the first paragraph of the article, 'The fight was credited by Dana White as the "most important fight in UFC history"[2] and the fight that brought the UFC into the mainstream.' particularly the piece after the [2]. Is this an opinion of the writer of the article, or is it the opinion of the footnoted article? If it is the former, it should be removed. If it is the ladder, shouldn't the footnote be moved to the end of the sentence? Aj10101 (talk) 20:51, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

The article says "Immediately after this match, Spike TV signed UFC to a long-term deal. A week later Couture and Liddell set the company record with 280,000 buys on pay-per-view. The UFC’s growth was about to skyrocket.". It's definetly one of the factors, but to say it was "the fight that brought the UFC into the mainstream" is a little far fetched so I'll remove it. --aktsu ^(t / c) 16:25, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Forrest Griffin vs. Stephan Bonnar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070926223217/http://www.mmaweekly.com/absolutenm/templates/dailynews.asp?articleid=1281&zoneid=13 to http://www.mmaweekly.com/absolutenm/templates/dailynews.asp?articleid=1281&zoneid=13
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080708195026/http://www.forrestgriffin.net/news/news_5.html to http://www.forrestgriffin.net/news/news_5.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090803213545/http://www.mmaweekly.com:80/absolutenm/templates/dailynews.asp?articleid=2880 to http://www.mmaweekly.com/absolutenm/templates/dailynews.asp?articleid=2880

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:13, 15 January 2016 (UTC)