Talk:Football at the 2011 Pacific Games – Men's tournament

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the season article task force.

Multi-sport events

Football at the 2011 Pacific Games – Men's tournament is within the scope of WikiProject Multi-sport events. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Multi-sport eventsWikipedia:WikiProject Multi-sport eventsTemplate:WikiProject Multi-sport eventsMulti-sport events articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Redlinks on nations at World Games and Universiade.
Assess : Rate each tagged article by quality and importance to the WikiProject if it has not been done. (Overview at Category:Unassessed Multi-sport events articles)
Cleanup : clean-up listing for Multi-sport_events
Expand : 2009 Beach South American Games. All article related to preview Asian Games, such as 1962 Asian Games, 1958 Asian Games, etc. - Also Papua New Guinea at the 2015 Pacific Games and Fiji at the 2015 Pacific Games: athletes for most sports still to be added. -- Other articles that need expansion are the nations and events of the 2019 African Games. Help appreciated.
Other : Articles on multi-sport events, less the Olympic and Paralympic Games, need to be tagged on their talk pages with {{WikiProject Multi-sport events}}.

Better page title edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

2011 Pacific Games men's football tournament? Matches the standards of year first which seems to be more common lately Jlsa (talk) 23:31, 14 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

I thought this kind of competition would follow along the same lines as something like the Olympics which have a similar title. Your thoughts? --Spartan008 (talk) 02:10, 15 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

That's obviously the alternative presentation. Just seems a bit odd when all the other WC quals list with date first (no doubt it would probably seem odd if all the Pacific Games stuff was X at the 2011 Pacific Games - not that I have any idea if such page exist - but I am obviously coming at the page from a 2014 viewpoint). Jlsa (talk)

Points table edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Looking at the "see the Tabs" option you can access from the match pages (such as here) suggests the tournament is using 4 points for a win, 1 for a loss (and presumably 2 for a draw). However, the football manual is the "pre-the-whole-no-WC-qualifier-thing" happening, so it is a bit out of date.

Anyone have any insights into what the tables should say? Jlsa (talk) 00:35, 30 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

The tables for this tournament should have 3 points for a win, 1 for a draw, and 0 for a loss. The current table with games played to August 30, 2011 can be viewed on the Oceania Football Confederation website with this format. I would take the OFC source to be definitive. It is unclear what the source is that gives the alternate point format and should be ignored since there is a much more reliable source available. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.65.58.19 (talk) 18:17, 30 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

You mean a source from an external organisation who put it in their automated software that they can't edit the settings on? Why would the official website of the tournament not be definitive and someone else's be so?Jlsa (talk) 22:49, 30 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 21 external links on Men's Football at the 2011 Pacific Games. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:54, 8 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (January 2018) edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Men's Football at the 2011 Pacific Games. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:43, 25 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic