Talk:Fool for Love (Buffy the Vampire Slayer)

Latest comment: 9 years ago by 82.139.86.180 in topic Whirlwind?

Untitled

edit

Please help complete the Angel/Buffy episode articles. See what needs to be done on this sub-page of WikiProject Buffy:

Wikipedia:WikiProject Buffy/Episodes

Also please help update any major changes made to episode articles on that page so that progress can be mapped.

Was Fool for Love or Darla aired first?

edit

The article said "'Darla', first aired earlier the same night" (emphasis mine). I don't remember directly (I'm not sure I was even watching back then), but wasn't Buffy airing before Angel at this point (season 5 of Buffy at 8:00, season 2 of Angel at 9:00)? That suggests Fool for Love aired before Darla. A few online sources (though none too reliable) confirm that order. So I'm changing a few pages to reflect that. If I'm wrong, please correct me, and at least we'll have this "conversation" to refer to later in case someone else gets the same idea. :) Pages affected: Fool for Love (Buffy episode), Darla (Angel episode), List of Angel episodes --Renophaston 18:51, 14 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Yep, you're right, "Fool for Love" was first. --Nalvage 20:49, 14 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Section

edit

In this episode, Angelus, while already re-ensouled hadn't chose yet to call himself Angel. --Gonzalo84 20:43, 6 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Buffy507.jpg

edit
 

Image:Buffy507.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:17, 13 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

The image Image:Spike 70s.gif is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --06:28, 31 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

For the record

edit

Blow by blow recounting of the episodes violates copyright...so I deleted the expanded overview. Lots42 (talk) 11:42, 14 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Currently...

edit

The current article is crammed full with speculation and original research. Lots42 (talk) 23:39, 3 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

I've been watching these again in order (along with Angel, as aired) and find that the discrepancy between the previously spoken origins of Spike's names in contrast to what is shown here is not necessarily a "continuity violation" and it's inclusion reflects the personal opinion of one who wrote it. Many times in history there is an accepted story behind something that has been often repeated to the point of being accepted as fact only to find out later through advances in science, research, or unveiled documentation that the accepted fact was wrong or misinformed. A continuity violation would be something that directly contradicts already established continuity but a person recanting hearsay does not fall under this as it had never been shown to be accurate. Should someone disagree, feel free to discuss. Chance X74 (talk) 11:45, 21 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Whirlwind?

edit

When were they given the name "Whirlwind"? —Tamfang (talk) 04:50, 10 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

In the Angel episode "Darla", originally aired directly after this Buffy episode. 82.139.86.180 (talk) 18:28, 11 February 2015 (UTC)Reply