Talk:Folole Muliaga
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
|
NPOV edit
All the articles that have been used as references for this article seem to be from the families side of the event. I feel the article is now written from one viewpoint, unfortunately the other side of the argument was not properly reported (Media beat up against mercury energy) so may not be easy to find to reference. Leaderofearth 08:22, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- I agree that the tone of the article has changed. But before the article was suffering due to weasel words ("many people have pointed"), POV language ("sadly") and in general lacked detail. I also agree that there needs to be something related to how the media reacted to the case, which as you've stated could be difficult to reference. We may need to wait a few weeks for the dust to settle, and the recaps to begin. Also the release of the results of the police investigation will be helpful. I think Wikipedia is important for these sorts of rapidly changing news stories where often an overview of the story is hard to get from the news media. Especially in cases like this where new facts are emerging every day. The same thing happened with the Kahui twins. Evil Monkey - Hello 09:15, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
Agreed. The article has certainly been improved with the re write, and hopefully when the details of the police investigaton are released the article can be pulled back into balance. Leaderofearth 09:21, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Folole Muliaga. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110811093543/http://www.ea.govt.nz/consumer/mdvc/ to http://www.ea.govt.nz/consumer/mdvc/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:19, 3 October 2017 (UTC)