Talk:Flightfox

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Flightfox is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Need some stub tags and some tags which add this to the relevant project. Not sure how to go about these. Wipkipkedia (talk) 02:59, 24 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Contested deletion edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Strong Keep WP:WEB "The content itself has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself", there are multiple news sources on the website, independent of FlightFox. Doesn't require deletion let alone a speedy deletion. Wipkipkedia (talk) 03:07, 24 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

A quick Google search finds there are multiple news sources. Even if a deletion debate was necessary, a speedy deletion is defnitely not required. Wipkipkedia (talk) 03:18, 24 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Add topic