Talk:Fire (1996 film)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Need for Balance

edit

Agreed but what about the others? Is there a balanced POV?

202.156.6.54 07:00, 24 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

As there are no other reviews cited in this article, I'm not sure what precisely you're referring to. Rebecca 07:03, 24 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

I tend to find reviews on the main page (Deepa Mehta) of her films and many of them are Pro-Mehta as an activist (particularly for women's issues) etc. I believe it would be informative for readers to know what some (some) feminists feel about her work.

202.156.6.54 07:46, 24 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Biased Plot Summary

edit

I find this plot summary to be particularly focused on the masculine aspects of the plot. I find this pretty insulting considering this is a movie about a relationship between two women. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by FelixFortuna (talkcontribs) 12:21, 13 July 2007.

If you can see changes that need to be made, feel free to make them. --Belovedfreak 14:32, 13 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

editing this page for class project

edit

Hi there! I'll be editing this page over the next few days for a class project for a college class. I'll be addressing events that surrounding the screening of the film in India, as well as well as the public dialogue around it, and linking it up to related topics. Lokchi (talk) 20:36, 14 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fire (1996 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:04, 31 December 2017 (UTC)Reply