Talk:Fanfare (company)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Page moved to Fanfare (company). Consensus was that the old name is not correct and is not the primary use. So I moved it to one of the suggested name. If there is a better name, it can be renominated immediately. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:11, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Fanfare Software → Fanfare — This is how the company is most commonly referred to. Adele Pronger (talk) 16:06, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

• Oppose. No reason for this to be the primary topic. Appropriate name would be Fanfare (company). Cassandra 73 (talk) 17:00, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

Discussion

Any additional comments:

• Are you suggesting replacement of the article currently present at Fanfare? That would be an extremely bad idea. Powers ^T 16:43, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
• The only way we could move this page would be to move it to Fanfare (software company). It might be a good idea to do so, since Fanfare Software isn't even the company's legal name (it's The Fanfare Group, Inc.). Or not. —Waterfox (talk) 00:35, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
• A fanfare is a sort of piece of trumpet music, not a computer company. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 10:12, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fanfare (company). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130905062154/http://graphicsweb.wsj.com/documents/NEXT_BIG_THING/NEXT_BIG_THING.html to http://graphicsweb.wsj.com/documents/NEXT_BIG_THING/NEXT_BIG_THING.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:04, 28 September 2017 (UTC)