Talk:Family Life

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Jenks24 in topic Requested move 14 February 2017
WikiProject iconDisambiguation
WikiProject iconThis disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.

Requested move 14 February 2017 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Magazine moved Family Life (Amish magazine). Jenks24 (talk) 08:52, 22 February 2017 (UTC)Reply



– No clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Rob Sinden (talk) 16:24, 14 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

But Family Life (Amish magazine) would be better. There are other magazines with this title. In ictu oculi (talk) 11:53, 15 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
There aren't any Wikipedia articles for other magazines, so no need for pre-emptive disambiguation. Additional disambiguation should only be used when there are other articles. --Rob Sinden (talk) 12:31, 15 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
Well that's easily solved. Created Family Life (Wenner Media magazine), far more mentioned in books. I suspect the reason that Family Life was the only major Wenner title without an article was because this Amish one has been squatting on the spot. And looking at "What links here" confirms that, unless the Amish magazine was in 1997 giving awards to Lego Island and Fort Worth Zoo? In ictu oculi (talk) 18:54, 15 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
Okay, so now it will have to be moved to Family Life (Amish magazine). --Rob Sinden (talk) 10:50, 16 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
  • Support. No clear primary topic, and if you were to arbitrarily pick one it probably wouldn't be the current one. —Xezbeth (talk) 08:56, 18 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.