Talk:Fallopian tube cancer
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Quisqualis in topic "Ovarian" carcinogenesis actually tubal?
Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Fallopian tube cancer.
|
A fact from Fallopian tube cancer appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 August 2008, and was viewed approximately 691 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"Ovarian" carcinogenesis actually tubal?
editThe past few years have shown that many "ovarian" carcinomas are in fact of tubal origin. Going back to 2008,[1] with "Ovarian carcinogenesis: an alternative hypothesis", and leading up to nearly the present, with "From the Ovary to the Fallopian Tube: A History of Ovarian Carcinogenesis"[2], it appears that the picture of tubal carcinoma has changed.
As a non-expert, it seems to me that the relevant WP articles are not keeping up. Are there editors who are subject experts who would like to update the Fallopian tube cancer and Ovarian cancer articles to reflect this changing conceptual framework?--Quisqualis (talk) 06:32, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
References
- ^ Piek JM, van Diest PJ, Verheijen RH (2008). "Ovarian carcinogenesis: an alternative hypothesis". Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 622: 79–87. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-68969-2_7. PMID 18546620.
- ^ Darwish, Ed., Atef (2015). Contemporary Gynecologic Practice, Ch. 7, From the Ovary to the Fallopian Tube: A History of Ovarian Carcinogenesis. InTech. ISBN 978-953-51-1736-0.
{{cite book}}
:|access-date=
requires|url=
(help)