Talk:Facial Action Coding System

Latest comment: 8 years ago by 86.135.11.52 in topic Ethics and Abuse

mistake in referencing reference #5 edit

"Although the labeling of expressions currently requires trained experts, researchers have had some success in using computers to automatically identify FACS codes, and thus quickly identify emotions. [5]"

Looking at [5], it does not relate to computers at all.

74.95.10.185 (talk) 22:19, 3 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

pars orbitalis is not a muscle. edit

Pars orbitalis is a bone; presumably there is some other muscle that is associated with a genuine smile? Vectro 21:24, 7 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

The muscle associated with the Duchenne Smile is the orbitis oculi, pars lateralis

Is this a commercial? edit

  1. Blink (book). Current bestseller has a section on FACS.

It links to a wikipedia article about the book, but its still a commercial product. Should that be allowed? Dream Focus (talk) 18:46, 15 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Probably not, though I suspect it should be elaborated. Gladwell uses FACS, and also has a personal interview with the scientists behind it in the book, to create an argument for how facial expression and intuition about other people's intentions are linked. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.136.90.246 (talk) 07:32, 10 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Suggestion / Request edit

Can we **please** include a facial expression for each item in the section [List of Action Units and Action Descriptors (with underlying facial muscles)|https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Facial_Action_Coding_System&action=edit&section=4]

The text seems devoid of relevance without actual human expressions for us (the reader) to relate! Hydradix (talk) 08:22, 21 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Facial Action Coding System. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:12, 10 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Ethics and Abuse edit

Are there any issues about ethics and abuse arising from this practice ?86.135.11.52 (talk) 22:35, 4 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Since March 2017, certain IP addresses like "89.155.174.171", "213.22.181.215" and "89.153.235.234", presumably Armindo Freitas-Magalhães, keep adding advertisements for a fake FACS 3.0 software (which through his website you can buy for $700). He includes fake references to non-existing papers, and replaces the real author of books by himself, among other references with his name. Please undo any edit that includes Armindo Freitas-Magalhães or FACS 3.0. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.37.160.22 (talk) date (UTC)