Talk:Fable: The Journey

Spell Crafting Mode

I've been following this games development since announcement, and while the wiki's description of Spell Crafting Mode certainly fits what Lionhead announced as their intent very early on in the games development, it doesn't seem to reflect the actual content of the game post release. I've added citation needed tags rather than out and out deleting this section if only because I've only owned the game for a day and I can't find a credible source that accurately describes how using spells works (but I assure you, it does not work like this). --JohnDoe244 (talk) 15:34, 15 October 2012 (UTC) -Fixed. 2600:1004:B01C:51E:0:0:0:103 (talk) 19:10, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Reception

I see, in its current state, that it does not reflect any of the negative comments about the game, and only seems to quote positives. Adding a tag. 86.11.247.18 (talk) 15:03, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Listing the problem here would be more use than tagging the article. Adding a tag doesn't explain your problem with the article. - X201 (talk) 15:41, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

The tag directs people to the talk page to engage in the discussion of improving the article. Ergo, it's extremely helpful. I don't quite understand. Addition: I don't want to become embroiled in Wikipedia again; so, if you wish, I won't have any objections if you remove it. Scarian^{Call me Pat!} 05:18, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

I just wanted to know what you meant by positives and negatives, it makes it easier to find reliable sources. - X201 (talk) 13:42, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Re-adding tag. Still does not address why the reviews were poor, instead consistently focusing on the positive (plot) of the game. A way to get rid of the tag would be to replace some of the positive quotes with negative quotes discussing the game's problems. --75.209.40.84 (talk) 20:55, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

I took a knife to the overly long and WP:UNDUE reviews section, and have balanced both the weight of positive and negative quotes as well as given the weight of reviews to the rest of the article, in my view, a better balance. I'm UNINVOLVED, currently working through POV disputes on articles whose titles begin with FA. Best regards, --j⚛e decker^talk 19:28, 31 May 2014 (UTC)