Provided links are not from reputable sources and one failed to load edit

Under "functions and effects" the sources listed are either not reputable or not accessable. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eyes_exercise#cite_note-5 links to a government run website that makes many positive claims yet refers to no published studies and does not refer to the subject directly. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eyes_exercise#cite_note-6 does not list any further sources and clearly has a bias as they advertise services related to the topic. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eyes_exercise#cite_note-7 failed to load as of 18/11/17. I suggest that the whole "functions and effects" section be removed or renamed as it is clearly not based on fact yet it purports to be so. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.63.34.131 (talk) 15:34, 18 November 2017 (UTC)Reply