Talk:Examinership

Issues

• The lede is two short sentences, so fails WP:LEDE which should summarise the whole article essentially as a stand alone precis section.
• No reliable third-party sources
• Too few citation and those that are there have too few details, such as "Irish Times". I suggest using the full citation templates {{cite web}}, {{cite news}}, {{cite journal}}, etc., found at WP:FURG or at the individual templates.
• External links in the prose should be replaced with citations, or external links, instead of linking prose to external links.
• Prose is probably too long for the topic.

Doing all the above should easily make it a B-class article. ww2censor (talk) 17:35, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

• Why do people write "lede" instead of "lead", short for "lead section"? Stifle (talk) 14:10, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

I believe that Lede is a term that is primarily used in US journalism. FrankFlanagan (talk) 08:40, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Declaration of interest

I have worked on some of the cases cited in this article and I am the third and fourth named author on two of the Lexology articles cited. I do not believe that this amounts to a conflict of interest but belive that this should be disclosed in the interests of transparency. The more commercial links on this page pre-date my editing. FrankFlanagan (talk) 12:42, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

EU Insolvency Regulation

If I'm not mislead the Examinership described here is the "Company examinership" referred to in Annex A of the EU Insolvency Regulation (1346/2000). This fact should be mentioned. (Also, if my guess is incorrect, the relationship of this proceeding to the Regulation should be clarified in my view.) This is particularly interesting for non-Irish readers, as a Scheme of Arrangement under English law isn't (part of) a proceeding recognised under the Regulation.

Btw: A well written article! Chilrreh (talk) 09:05, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Examinership. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110928024716/http://www.lawlibrary.ie/documents/publications/declanmurphy.pdf to http://www.lawlibrary.ie/documents/publications/declanmurphy.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721123246/http://www.courts.ie/rules.nsf/8652fb610b0b37a980256db700399507/df79b949b7ce285980256f24004bf9ff?OpenDocument to http://www.courts.ie/rules.nsf/8652fb610b0b37a980256db700399507/df79b949b7ce285980256f24004bf9ff?OpenDocument

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:19, 26 September 2017 (UTC)