Talk:Epsilon Virginis
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Hyades cluster edit
I could find no evidence for the following, so I removed it from the article:
- There is evidence that Vindemiatrix is part of the Hyades group, associated with the cluster of that name in the constellation Taurus.[citation needed]
The idea may have originated from Arimoto and Cayrel de Strobel (1988), who were doing a study of four members of the Hyades cluster. But the authors were only ever using ε Vir as a comparison star. Regards, RJH (talk) 00:04, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
Vindemiator edit
-trix = Latin female form for male -or. Is there an actual historical use of the male form or is it just mentioned because the referenced Mr. Kaler thinks Vindemiatrix is a "somewhat corrupted feminized Latin form for the original Greek name"? My assumption is that the Romans used the female form because their general term stella = star is of female gender. --84.159.123.7 (talk) 09:10, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Eccentricity of 0.11 edit
The article claims "This star is following an orbit through the Milky Way with an eccentricity of 0.11. This will carry it as close as 7.25 kpc (23.6 kly) to the Galactic Center, and take it as far as 8.95 kpc (29.2 kly)". Any source?? I think it's unlikely that this is a meaningful statement. Stellar orbits within the Milky Way are nothing like simple ellipses, and we certainly can't calculate the maximum and minimum distances of this star from the center. I'm removing this sentence. 70.215.5.165 (talk) 17:52, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Epsilon Virginis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100819122914/http://www.lcsd.gov.hk/CE/Museum/Space/Research/StarName/c_research_chinengstars_t_z.htm to http://www.lcsd.gov.hk/CE/Museum/Space/Research/StarName/c_research_chinengstars_t_z.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100810114313/http://www.lcsd.gov.hk/CE/Museum/Space/Research/StarName/e_research_chinengstarzone_b.htm#SupremePalaceEnclosure to http://www.lcsd.gov.hk/CE/Museum/Space/Research/StarName/e_research_chinengstarzone_b.htm#SupremePalaceEnclosure
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:13, 25 December 2016 (UTC)