Talk:Epizeuxis

Greece Low‑importance

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Linguistics Low‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

Richard Cooke (February 17, 2020). "Wikipedia Is the Last Best Place on the Internet". Wired. Retrieved February 27, 2020. No knowledge is truly useless, but at its best, Wikipedia weds this ranging interest to the kind of pertinence where Larry David's "Pretty, pretty good!" is given as an example of rhetorical epizeuxis.

Untitled edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

This is actually more of a traditional rhetorical-philological term than it is a modern linguistics term... AnonMoos (talk) 00:27, 26 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

This is the my favourite wikipedia page ever. OnlyTheWanderer — Preceding unsigned comment added by OnlyTheWanderer (talk • contribs) 01:21, 13 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Yes - I like it too. If only more pages were modelled on it ! It is short, to the point, well expressed without grammatical or semantic solecisms, and even the spelling seems to be correct. The sentences actually make sense ! Above all it is understandable - you come away feeling that you have learned something ! g4oep — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.96.60.31 (talk) 08:45, 21 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Pak15, Ath28.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:46, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Diacope edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This word seems to be essentially identical, at least as far as wikipedia knows, to Diacope. They are both listed on Repetition (rhetorical device) with essentially the same description. Perhaps they should be merged, or if they are actually different, differentiated? Personman (talk) 03:55, 22 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add topic