Talk:Endgame, Inc.

Why is 'systems' not capitalized in the page name? And why is this page linking to stolen email data? Please see WP:ELNEVER. Go vols! (talk) 18:20, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Endgame systems is one of the main players in cybersecurity at the heart of an ongoing and public debate about the role of the state, private companies and the difference between cybersecutiry and cyber war. I will continue to add NPOV sources in the coming hours. Infoeco (talk) 16:41, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Your source from aljazeera does not mention the company, thus its notability is contested. Problems need to be corrected immediately to survive CSD. Phearson (talk) 15:47, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Maybe I read the article wrong or the link didn't work. Here is what I have from the article:

http://english.aljazeera.net/indepth/opinion/2011/03/20113981026464808.html

"Maybe HBGary was an outlier?

At this point we could make the jump that HBGary was a single bad apple, operating on the other side of the ethical line all on its own, but we would be wrong.

The email above indicates that the project to discredit WikiLeaks (and their supporters) was a joint operation by HBGary Federal, Palantir and BericoTechnologies, although the other companies involved were quick to distance themselves from HBGary after the Anonymous hack.

Endgame Systems, a company with almost no public footprint were also thrust into the spotlight, when several of their previously well-guarded reports and company presentations were shared amongst the emails.

In an early email to Aaron Barr, Endgame Systems made it clear that they had "been very careful NOT to have public face on our company". The CEO of Endgame Systems was clear: "Please let HBgary know we don't ever want to see our name in a press release."

So what exactly do the secretive Endgame Systems do? The company started by ex ISS and CIA executives promises (in private) "to provide our customers with the highest quality offensive CNA/CNE (Computer Network Attack/Computer Network Exploitation) software in the world".

Their overview makes it clear that they serve "the special requirements of the United States DoD and Intelligence Community".Infoeco (talk) 15:53, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

I see it a passing mention. Doesn't cut the mustard I'm afraid. But hey, good luck in not repeating history. Phearson (talk) 16:13, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

"Good luck in not repeating history"... Has there been a past version of this article that was marked for deletion? Could you point me to that archive? Somewhat new to starting new stubs relating to current events. Infoeco (talk) 16:23, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Err, no. I thought you were an editor related to this company, and in regards to the Security V. Anonymous situation. Regards, Phearson (talk) 16:27, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

@Phearson, what do you recommend doing for broken links in articles? I thought content must be verifiable? This article seems to have a lot of broken links. Thanks, Factchecker77 14 May 2011 —Preceding undated comment added 23:44, 14 May 2011 (UTC).

Locate a working a working mirror, check the wayback machine, news sites, etc. I don't have time ATM but I will look tomorrow. Phearson (talk) 03:28, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Endgame, Inc.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101212174748/http://atdc.org/2010/11/the-startup-chronicles-endgame-systems.html to http://atdc.org/2010/11/the-startup-chronicles-endgame-systems.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110812184236/http://www.networkworld.com/news/2011/021411-hp-malware.html to http://www.networkworld.com/news/2011/021411-hp-malware.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:57, 24 December 2016 (UTC)