This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
Emmie Russell is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Latest comment: 1 month ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Sources need to be more diverse than Orthoptics Australia and the Australian Dictionary of Biography - there seem to be references available from different sources than these ones e.g. consider some results via Google Scholar. Dl2000 (talk) 23:53, 2 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Seems like a nice idea, but I question the use of "need". We have lots of articles with one good source.... (and some with none!) This one has several different authors. If anyone is moved to add stuff from Google Scholar then that is usually a good source and it will improve this article. They may find your advice helpful. Thanks. Victuallers (talk) 13:18, 3 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Ideally sources other than Orthoptics Australia and ADB should be found, in the spirit of WP:PSTS. OA can be considered primary, ADB tertiary, so ideally we'd want one or more secondary sources besides these to help support content, notability, etc. Hopefully those can be added in due course; in hindsight, "other sources exist" may not have been the ideal designation to identify that gap. Dl2000 (talk) 02:10, 4 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=logo}
