This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
This article was created or improved during the Women in Science edit-a-thon hosted by the Women in Red project in November 2015. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles
This page should not be speedy deleted because...edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion
This page should not be speedily deleted because... This woman is a well-known scientist in the UK and I literally just created the article without being given enough time to add any documentation, and it was one listed in the Women in science editathon as needing creation. It appears the nominator has been too quick on the draw in deleting a number of articles. --LovelyLillith (talk) 10:55, 11 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
The article is literally a two sentence article so it does it take long to read it. Also, sandbox would be the perfect place to work on articles that need documentations.
Please let me know if I can help in any way. MarkYabloko 11:10, 11 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
It was two sentences because I had all of 11 minutes to work on it from creation! Please do not speedily delete articles in progress; for those who build in one swoop as I do, as well as new editors who have no knowledge of the sandbox, it is very disruptive. LovelyLillith (talk) 12:10, 11 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
I am glad to see your article coming around nicely! Keep the good work! MarkYabloko 18:05, 11 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
It is written "she is, of course, Jewish"....surely I'm not the only person to find that an odd sentence! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.92.69.186 (talk) 06:34, 22 May 2016 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi {{u|LovelyLillith}}{{ping|LovelyLillith|User2|User6}}, I've added a couple of sections to this article and agree with you it shouldn't be deleted. And if you'd be so kind to 3O review Draft:Sorcha Faal and Draft talk:Sorcha Faal it would be greatly appreciated.Picomtn (talk) 11:31, 24 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Under the 'Tim Hunt Controversy' section - "she complained about sexist remarks on Twitter and YouTube which were in fact just criticisms after she clearly lost the debate." According to whom did she "clearly" lose the debate? And how can we verify that they weren't racist or sexist? Also, "just criticisms" is not neutral or scholarly in tone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.49.10.184 (talk) 19:32, 19 October 2017 (UTC)Reply
The page was vandalized and has been fixed - thank you for bringing our attention to it. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 23:20, 19 October 2017 (UTC)Reply
