Talk:Emergenetics International

No pros/cons or critiques

Not only on this Wikipedia Page, but also through many searches there is very little critical material on a widely marketed approach that has been around since 1985. Disproving such theories is not critical, but challenging them is critical. The source material was lifted from the work of Ned Herrmann, who was not a psychiatrist, psychologist, nor neurologist, yet proponents of this approach constantly cite "brain science." One would expect citations of peer reviews, debate, and other "chatter" surrounding this for-profit tool. There are few that I have found, aside from a critique on Amazon.com of one of the books on the subject and a critique of a Nevada school system spending exorbitant amounts of money on this not scientifically proven discipline.

Lack of dissent is of itself suspicious. We are not discussing something so established as the law of gravity, and yet even that law has argument surrounding it (Newton's calculations were oh-so-slightly off.)

It would be highly useful for scientists and legal experts to weigh in on the strengths, weaknesses, and issues surrounding Emergenetics. 2600:4040:2ACF:300:D433:D859:5D6B:5121 (talk) 18:49, 25 July 2023 (UTC)