 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
POV
editThis article seems to be very POV in favour of the innocence of Mr Felker. have tagged it as such. WillE 12:48, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
The presented facts indicate his innocence. A neutrality tag is not a substitute for claiming that there is significant evidence of Felker's guilt. You have to present such evidence. The fact that some one-sided political groups may support one position, while other one-sided groups may support another is irrelevant. There are plenty of death penalty supporters who do not support the conviction and execution of people who are innocent, or whose guilt is not proven beyond a reasonable doubt. --Danras (talk) 13:34, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
The article has a definite bias toward the facts that support the perspective of those who feel. If he is innocent, present all the facts, whether you personally feel that they are relevant or not. Scosco62 11:34, 10 May 2008 (UTC)