Talk:Eaglexpress

This article was nominated for deletion on 16 September 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Eaglexpress article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Malaysia Mid‑importance

	Malaysia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Malaysia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Malaysia and Malaysia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MalaysiaWikipedia:WikiProject MalaysiaTemplate:WikiProject MalaysiaMalaysia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Aviation: Airlines

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked

This article is supported by the airline project.

Contested deletion edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Instead of speedy deletion it was taken to articles for deletion Here.

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (Its a stub on a new airline, just like similar stubs that were created and gradually developed into full articles, editors asscociated with Wikiprojet: Airlines have created such stubs on new airlines with approval of the project community and its based on those templates, therefore valid and worthy of keeping.) --inspector (talk) 13:27, 16 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

It's an airline that is not actually operating and the only source is to its own website. noq (talk) 13:34, 16 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

it starts flying later this week, infact its first flight was in february therefore its functioning. inspector (talk) 13:37, 16 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

There is another source, also other airlines have articles before they stated flying. An example is Scoot & Fastjet. This article does not meet the requirements for speedy deletion. --JetBlast (talk) 14:28, 16 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic