Talk:Duplex mismatch

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Networking task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Assessment edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

This page needs

table of contents
a little more context
a way to integrate it into the autonegotiation, Ethernet over twisted pair and Duplex (telecommunications) pages. - the first two repeat some of the same information.

I do think this is a useful page.--Boscobiscotti 04:21, 8 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

The table of contents is added automatically when the article contains three or more sections. It can be forced (by somethingh like __TOC__ I think, but I am not convinced this is so needed here. As for the other two points, I agree with the need for more context, but I do not think that having repeated information on different articles is necessarily a problem. Tizio 12:08, 8 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

The Link to Ethernet auto-sensing and auto-negotiating does not work anymore. I have updated the link. 10:13, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

I believe this is a useful page. However, when I saw a duplex mismatch, the full-duplex side (Cisco 6509) reported CRC errors and giants, not runts. Can an expert confirm it's also possible? --195.160.149.37 (talk) 07:23, 20 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

The source :: Jim Eggers and Steve Hodnett (July 2004). "Ethernet Autonegotiation Best Practices". Sun Microsystems. :: is so erroneous. Autoneg on twisted pair performs under the PMD and by this differs much from Autoneg on fiber, but the authors didn't see that therefore the result is theirs fantasy, not the real and/or Standard. There is the need to eliminate the source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.232.61.94 (talk) 14:53, 27 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Duplex mismatch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110714165042/http://www.netcordia.com/resources/tech-tips/switch-port-duplex-mismatch.asp to http://www.netcordia.com/resources/tech-tips/switch-port-duplex-mismatch.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:43, 14 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic