Talk:Dum Maaro Dum (film)

Name's spelling

The spelling of the movie is Dum Maaro Dum and not 'Maro', someone please change it. Accomplished MohitKanwal Mohit Kanwal 06:59, 28 March 2011 (UTC) Fanofbollywood (talk) 09:50, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

wikipedia needs to b impartial

movies of abhishek like guru and bunty aur babli have thier gross revenues as amount given in "nett gross revenue section" of boxofficeindia.com... which reduces it considerably as compared to the figures of salman khan movies which have figures of revenue , qouted from "gross revenue" section and not from "net gross revenue section" of BOI. ex-- dabangg and wanted also gross revenue of dum maaro dum is "32 crores in india and 51 crores worldwide" according to BOXOOFICEINDIA.COM and GLAMSHAM.COM. but wikipedia qoutes it to be 22 crores... one of user even made it to 7 crores yesterday... is this not tarring the image of wikipedia... and if wikipedia accepts BOI.COM as standard source of box office... can anyone tell me... how on earth a movie of budget 20crores DMD is labelled flop after making 32 crores in domestic circuit.. and a movie like thank you is tagged average after loosin 9 crores on box office... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shaurya 88 (talk • contribs) 23:38, 20 May 2011 (UTC) --roughness (talk) 07:14, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

Himansh22 66 (talk) 03:16, 23 December 2011 (UTC) Also, why does the cost of the movie show up as 35 crore on the main page? The link which is given (as a reference , or source /citation, when you read that link, the cost clearly says 20 crore. So why has the cost been marked up to 35 crore? This is bias-you double up the cost, reduce its gross profit to net profit, and say the movie is flop

11.6 cr on the first day

Rohan Sippy the director of the film himself stated that the film collected rs.11.6 cr on the first day[world wide]and it has collected rs 49.6 cr worldwide but here it is written 31 cr — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jay 9987 (talk • contribs) 11:59, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Please cite some reliable sources. Wikipedia works on sources and not word of mouth. --- Managerarc™ ^talk 13:54, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dum Maaro Dum (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://expressbuzz.com/entertainment/reviews/dum-maaro-dum/268320.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130604214749/http://boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=368&catName=MjAxMQ== to http://boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=368&catName=MjAxMQ==

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:34, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Dum Maaro Dum (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120419150736/http://www.boxofficeindia.com/boxnewsdetail.php?page=shownews&articleid=3944&nCat= to http://boxofficeindia.com/boxnewsdetail.php?page=shownews&articleid=3944&nCat=
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110426022052/http://movies.ndtv.com/movie_Review.aspx?id=613 to http://movies.ndtv.com/movie_Review.aspx?id=613
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110425020348/http://www.hindustantimes.com/mayank-shekhar-s-review-dum-maaro-dum/article1-688472.aspx to http://www.hindustantimes.com/Mayank-Shekhar-s-review-Dum-Maaro-Dum/Article1-688472.aspx
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120419150736/http://www.boxofficeindia.com/boxnewsdetail.php?page=shownews&articleid=3944&nCat= to http://boxofficeindia.com/boxnewsdetail.php?page=shownews&articleid=3944&nCat=

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:17, 14 September 2017 (UTC)