This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lighthouses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lighthouses and other water navigational aids on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LighthousesWikipedia:WikiProject LighthousesTemplate:WikiProject LighthousesLighthouses articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
All sources I've found contain major contradictions concerning the circumstances of the construction of the first light, compounded by some major differences as to what the various photographs depict. They all agree on the following: an 1870 appropriation, construction beginning in 1872, and first light in 1874. The problem with this, as hinted by Kraig Anderson's background material, is that in 1870 there was no ship canal; and indeed the injunction intended to block its construction wasn't granted until July 1871, about ten weeks after the diggers broke through to the lake. Therefore it's hard to see how the appropriation could have been for a light for the canal. The only way I could make sense of this is to conclude that (again, following some of Anderson's narrative) the light was initially intended for one of the docks that preceded the canal, but was re-sited to the canal's breakwater when construction actually began. At any rate, I don't feel I can repeat their narrative as they give it. Mangoe (talk) 15:04, 3 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
