Talk:Draycott, Somerset

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Somerset Low‑importance

	Somerset portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Somerset, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Somerset on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SomersetWikipedia:WikiProject SomersetTemplate:WikiProject SomersetSomerset articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organise tag

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This article is a mess. Material in the lead could go elsewhere. The section 'the narrows' includes OT material, and I question whether this section should be here at all, as well as needing a citation. Derek Andrews (talk) 21:17, 23 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Have re-organised the lead and marked the article as stub class and changed the tag accordingly. Polyamorph (talk) 07:38, 19 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

St Peter's

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Added a brief section on the Burges font controversy. Surely notable in the context of this small parish. KJP1 (talk) 14:08, 19 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Draycott, Somerset. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20121224025224/http://www.cpo.org.uk/magazines/news?newsaction=view&newspage=134&newsid=1870 to http://www.cpo.org.uk/magazines/news?newsaction=view&newspage=134&newsid=1870

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:00, 13 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic