Talk:Dragonology

((isn'taforo))

Redirect

This page didn't cover cryptozoology, Magic is explictally not cryptozoology. I've merged to to a section on Dragon, and substantially rewritten. Zeimusu | Talk page 15:28, 22 November 2005 (UTC)

References

All of the information on this page related to the book series titled "Dragonology", edited by Dugald A. Steer, starting with the first book in 2003. I have thus added in information regarding the books and referencing them and the website. Sources had been given earlier, but were removed for some reason. 199.174.215.49 22:25, 27 December 2006 (UTC)jhkim 27 December 2006

Stats

I don't think stats should be on this page. Wikipedia is not dragonology class. --Gp75motorsports ^{REV LIMITER} 00:46, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Some stats may be permissible, as it gives a short summary and more detail to the article. --Sapphire Dragon777 (talk) 16:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

The Dragons

I think you should add excerpts of dragons to make the page not seem as short as it is.

--Pumagirl7 (talk) 21:47, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Added an excerpt as requested. --Sapphire Dragon777 (talk) 16:03, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

List

I think someone should list the species of dragon with a link to there respective Wikipedia pages. I cannot find this information anywhere and require it for one of my internet projects. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.191.110.198 (talk) 18:27, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Added a list of the species of dragons as an excerpt. Hope this helps. --Sapphire Dragon777 (talk) 16:03, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

The Game

Does anyone have any knowledge concerning the Dragonology video game that supposedly came out? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.213.45.24 (talk) 20:48, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

'No'?

Why is there a no in front of the list of merchandise and many of its items? No Sets, Games, and Toys No Dragonology: The Board Game No Dragonology: Hatch (cards) No Series 1 Dragon Toys No Series 2 Dragon Toys No Miniature Dragon Toys Brackattax (talk) 12:42, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

This is fictional

I have gone through and made a lot of changes considering how Dragonology is fictional. It does make claims that it is true inside the books, but all the copyrights state that it is, legally, fictional. The article must be treated as if it is about a fictional subject. That means all fictional characters must be stated as fictional. I know a lot of you probably want to keep the article similar to the books in that way, but this is an encyclopedia. Not a novel. I'm sorry for this, but when Wikipedia says that the article is having trouble keeping fact and fiction apart, the article is having trouble keeping fact and fiction apart.

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Dragonology/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

I am Dr.Rodriguez and i am a dragonologist believe it or not and these books are very well written and the stories are great i just love them Dr.Ernest your the best.

Last edited at 02:36, 10 June 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 13:48, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dragonology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070430222642/http://www.templarpublishing.co.uk/ologies/dragonology.html to http://www.templarpublishing.co.uk/ologies/dragonology.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:05, 13 September 2017 (UTC)