Talk:Double Image (novel)

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Anthony Appleyard in topic Requested move

Requested move

edit
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved: discussion ran for 21 days. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:31, 20 March 2011 (UTC)Reply



Double ImageDouble Image (novel) — a new page also now exists named Double Image Backup, for which a dis ambiguous page will be made referring to both topics/articles. The proposed Double Image page would then look like this (advise welcome, I am new here):


Double Image commonly refers to:

--M9fky7U2 (talk) 21:20, 27 February 2011 (UTC)Reply


  • Oppose; per WP:TWODABS, there's no need for a disambiguation page when there are only two items in question. Just use a hatnote to point readers to the new article. Powers T 02:40, 28 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • To most people Double Image without disambigger is double image is double vision, or the result of photographc double exposure or of moving the camera during the exposure, or similar, or a stereographic image pair, not a routine obscure thriller novel. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:28, 28 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • Support, as Anthony says, we seem to have at least three topics here; and if there is a primary one, the novel (whose article is nothing more than a plot summary, so we don't even know that it's notable enough to be here at all) seems to be the least likely contender.--Kotniski (talk) 10:57, 7 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • Support, and add a see also pointing to the existing double vision DAB to the proposed new DAB. This does at least barely qualify as a third topic, so it's no longer a two-way DAB. This new DAB as proposed is by far the neatest solution to what could be quite a tricky topic to navigate, especially for those for whom English is a second language (noting that this Wikipedia is for all English speakers not just native speakers). Andrewa (talk) 15:25, 8 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.