Talk:Doga language

	New Guinea portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Papua New Guinea, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Papua New Guinea on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Papua New GuineaWikipedia:WikiProject Papua New GuineaTemplate:WikiProject Papua New GuineaPapua New Guinea articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Languages Low‑importance

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Proposal for deletion

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

It's true that only one source is referenced in the article, but there are other sources given in the Further Reading and External Links sections. I don't know of any Wikipedia guidelines on what makes a language notable. There are 200 speakers. Of course, if the number of speakers dwindles, it might become even more notable. In any case, I don't think it's necessary to remove this stub class article. _signed,Willondon (talk) 00:39, 22 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic