Talk:Distant Relatives

Edit request from Westpac08, 22 May 2010

{{editsemiprotected}} add 2 new reviews for this album from allhiphop.com and hiphopdx.com

add allhiphop as 10 out of 10 http://allhiphop.com/stories/reviewsmusic/archive/2010/05/13/22216146.aspx

add Hiphopdx as 4.5/5 http://www.hiphopdx.com/index/reviews/id.1430/title.nas-damian-marley-distant-relatives

Westpac08 (talk) 18:44, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Not done: the "Critical Response" section is already pretty bulky. It's not necessary for Wikipedia to include a capsule summary of every review that has been posted on the net. Tim Pierce (talk) 19:12, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Yes then why don't we replace one or two reviews then? IMO we should have at least one review from hip-hop website or publishing and similarly for reggae. I really don't understand why we need to keep the Rolling Stone "review" (which is really just a rating and a couple of lines) just for the sake of reputation. Do U(knome)? ^yes..._{or no} 12:57, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Jeff Weisses review, for the Los Angeles times, should be removed. if you go to the link and scroll down the comments, you will find one from him saying "I didn't really listen to this so sorry for the wack review". Thus it should not be included. Link: http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/music_blog/2010/05/album-review-nas-and-damian-marleys-distant-relatives.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.75.187.209 (talk) 17:05, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

RE. Sure, thats him. ;) Dan56 (talk) 20:47, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

chart source

The chart source for the Canadian Albums Chart should be provided by Jam!, which according to wikipedia is "currently the only media outlet that publishes a comprehensive collection of the official Canadian record charts as compiled by Nielsen SoundScan and Nielsen Broadcast Data Systems". This source shows the chart positions for Canada according to Nielsen SoundScan. Billboard should be used for US charting, since its charts concern sales in the US. Dan56 (talk) 16:40, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Distant Relatives. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6B29Du2Wp?url=http://www.radio1.gr/music/forthcoming_uk_singles.htm to http://www.radio1.gr/music/forthcoming_uk_singles.htm
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio1/chart/singles/
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.billboard.com/charts/reggae-albums?chartDate=2010-06-05
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio1/chart/albums/
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio1/chart/rnbalbums/
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.mtv.de/charts/album50
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://music.msn.com/music/consumerguide/?photoidx=5
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120229140720/http://worldmusic.nationalgeographic.com/view/page.basic/distant_relatives_webcast/en_US;jsessionid=6EB925752B67B25E692CF21BAE2D83F5 to http://worldmusic.nationalgeographic.com/view/page.basic/distant_relatives_webcast/en_US;jsessionid=6EB925752B67B25E692CF21BAE2D83F5

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:35, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Distant Relatives. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://exclaim.ca/articles/generalarticlesynopsfullart.aspx?csid1=131&csid2=844&fid1=37732
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100528063944/http://www.thesource.com/2009/12/nas-and-damian-marley-distant-relatives-coming-in-2010 to http://www.thesource.com/2009/12/nas-and-damian-marley-distant-relatives-coming-in-2010/
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://music.msn.com/music/consumerguide/?photoidx=5
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://worldmusic.nationalgeographic.com/view/page.basic/distant_relatives_webcast/en_US%3Bjsessionid%3D6EB925752B67B25E692CF21BAE2D83F5

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:38, 11 September 2017 (UTC)