Talk:Descendants: Wicked World
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Material from Descendants: Wicked World was split to List of Descendants: Wicked World episodes on 21 January 2017 from this version. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution. |
Requested move 23 September 2015
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved. Unopposed for over a week. Jenks24 (talk) 07:03, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
Disney's Descendants: Wicked World → Descendants: Wicked World – the "Disney's" is unnecessary, it is absent in the TV guide as well, only D:WW is shown. See the logo as well, while the Disney logo is present it does not say "Disney's". This appears to be a misunderstanding originating from YouTube, Disney is not part of the actual title. 64.228.91.102 (talk) 17:41, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Character list
editUsing a table for this is completely unnecessary and hurts accessibility. Also, the criteria for "special guest" role appears to be original research. Any character which has appeared in at least 2–3 episodes can be called "recurring", and those who appeared in only one are not notable enough for inclusion. They can be listed in the corresponding episode description, but those credits need references too, as they do not seem to appear in the episodes themselves. Characters which have not appeared yet should not be included in the list without reliable sources. – nyuszika7h (talk) 22:08, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
- I agree looking over the article that the table is excessive. A characters section with subheadings for main and recurring would be easier to read and understand. A guest star with an article showing some notability of the actor is likely notable for inclusion in a guest subsection. Non-notable actors should not be included in the character section unless in the main or recurring cast but should show up in the episode descriptions. Geraldo Perez (talk) 23:05, 15 December 2015 (UTC)