Talk:Discoveries of exoplanets

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 193.146.134.8 in topic First evidence of an exoplanet

First evidence of an exoplanet

edit

It seems that the first evidence that exoplanets existed was obtained in 1917. The contamination of the spectra of van Maanen's Star, a white dwarf, signaled the presence of an exoplanet in the near past. This was realized in 2016 according to NASA:

https://www.nasa.gov/feature/jpl/overlooked-treasure-the-first-evidence-of-exoplanets — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.146.134.8 (talk) 12:42, 30 August 2023 (UTC)Reply


Bar graph outdated

edit

Hi there, I just want to let people know that the graph with the bars on the current status of planet finding by method is out of date. The last update was October 2010 and as far as I know, there are a lot of new planets discovered after that date. How about the Kepler finding of roughly 1200 planets for example? At least some of those should already be confirmed.

What do you people think? :) 83.136.195.130 (talk) 08:19, 24 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Updated. AldaronT/C 18:01, 14 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Please include citations with edit updates.

edit

In order to avoid edit reverts, please include appropriate references (WP:RS) with newly added updated edits - in any case - enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 12:54, 14 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Discoveries of exoplanets. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:07, 13 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

"stop exploring whats not in your solar system or its Alien invasion"

edit

How is this a section of this article? There goes all reputability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.218.24.11 (talk) 17:22, 23 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Discoveries of exoplanets. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:35, 11 September 2017 (UTC)Reply