 | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
Request move edit
Should be moved to just Dio. RandySavageFTW (talk) 04:05, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
- On 8 March someone attempted to do a copy-and-paste move of Dio to Dio (band) and then redirected "Dio" to here. I just reverted both; otherwise "Dio (band)" would not show the very substantial history of "Dio". If the band is not the primary topic for the sole word "Dio" (I think it probably is, because only the Tenacious D song could also be titled with just the single word), then it should first be moved properly to "Dio (band)" before this dab page can be moved to "Dio". Station1 (talk) 06:39, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
- Support per discussion at Talk:Dio#Dio_or_Dio_.28band.29. The band is not WP:PRIMARYUSAGE; there is none. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 18:52, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
first what comes first edit
I was reading the discussion on Dio vs. Dio (Band) being main page vs. a disambiguation page. The Dio (Band) side won, ok. However, it won by too much; the disambiguation page now starts with Cassius Dio, and Dio (Band) is number 16 or 17 on the list, while still being, by very very far, the one that people are most looking for.
The alphabetical order ("Ancient history" vs. "Music") is not a valid argument, because there's "Places" and "People" in the middle.
So, it seems this is simple prejudice - "ancient history" being more "important" than "Music".
The disambiguation page is, in this case, already against the normal rules, so it certainly should have first what comes first in terms of searches - Dio (Band) and Ronnie James Dio.
Nunoni (talk) 12:02, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
Someone reverted to the previous version without answering this. I am reverting back. If you want to do it differently, you need to justify why. Nunoni (talk) 14:01, 3 December 2010 (UTC)