Talk:Digambara literature

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Malaiya in topic Simandhar Swami is not "Living God"


Requested move 1 May 2020

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:54, 25 May 2020 (UTC)Reply



Jain Agamas (Digambara)Digambara literature – better title per wikipedia standards Capankajsmilyo(Talk | Infobox assistance) 15:50, 1 May 2020 (UTC)Relisted. – Ammarpad (talk) 10:23, 9 May 2020 (UTC)Reply


The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The title Digambara literature is incorrect

edit

The Digambara tradition has numerous other texts. Mahapurana, Ratnakranda Shravakachara, Dravya Sangrah and hundreds of other texts. The older title was Jain Agamas (Digambara) was better. In reality the books discussed here are not agamas, but books that regarded to be "agama-tulya".

Malaiya (talk) 02:03, 23 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Simandhar Swami is not "Living God"

edit

Simandhar Swami is considered to a a living Tirthankara in Videha Kshetra. He is not [God] in the sense of the common usage of the word. There is no Abrahamic, creator God in Jainism.

Malaiya (talk) 02:11, 23 November 2020 (UTC)Reply