Talk:Did My Time

Latest comment: 11 years ago by 2601:A:4100:5A:CD2B:B81B:3468:4006 in topic Nu metal

Written by Metallica? edit

Is this a Metallica song, or why is this written by Lars Ulrich and James Hetfield? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.130.29.164 (talk) 02:49, 12 February 2007 (UTC).Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Korn-did my time.jpg edit

 

Image:Korn-did my time.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:29, 5 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Korn did my time.jpg edit

 

Image:Korn did my time.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 01:41, 7 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Nu metal edit

All sources for nu metal are reliable as I previewed them frequently. This one says that they have gone to their roots with some frequent rap music elements and went back to the roots, read the entire thing, it gave it a positive review, saying it was good but was related to albums like Life is Peachy and was defined as nu metal. This one quoted nu metal in the paragraph

Korn's last album, 2002's Untouchables, was greeted to mainly deaf ears and a critical panning. The band who had done nothing less than re-invent heavy metal in the mid to late '90s had taken three years to record their fifth album and spent a small country's GDP on futuristic production techniques. In doing so, they lost half their audience which, ironically, had had its ears re-tuned to simpler, cleaner, "nu-metal" bands who wouldn't have existed without Korn's trailblazing in the first place.

which says that after a few years of no albums from Issues to Untouchables which made them lose their fans who then moved to bands who were influenced by Korn but Mislabeled nu metal. This one says they are the nu metal founding fathers implying they pioneered nu metal in their early years which has been sourced on wiki and their early work being nu metal is sourced on wiki. It said they return to their roots.

The first link, as I've explained, does not explicitly say that they are nu metal. "Back to their roots" may imply that, but you reaching that conclusion is original research (please click this link and learn what I mean by original research). The second link does not say that they are nu metal. If you actually read the link, you'll see that it says that the fans are listening to other bands that are nu metal. Furthermore, it outright says that this song is not nu metal. The third one again goes back to the original research problem. It does not say that this song, nor this album, is nu metal. – Richard BB 21:24, 28 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Well I looked at this guy's sources and the second one said that the other bands tagged as nu metal that others started listening to like linkin park and slipknot were others, saying MOST of them were not that heavy like korn's TALITM album. However it says these:

"In a nod back to the days of Life Is Peachy and Follow The Leader, there's even a rap song, Play Me featuring Nas on vocals. The result is incendiary: forget the rap-lite of Children Of The Korn, this is Bodycount playing in a rat-infested dungeon."

"So, Take A Look In The Mirror finds Korn going back to basics."

Just because fans didn't like untouchables, doesn't mean they changed their genre, but they did just sound less like their 90s stuff creating a unique sound. The thing is you can source things on the talk page but that doesn't stop you from discussing the genre by using sources to determine that their early work was nu metal.

Like this:

Metallica are thrash in the 80s

90s they are not

in 2008 they return and some reviewers say they go back to their roots. Now on the talk page for death magnetic, you can go on the talk page, not the actual page but the talk page to discuss changes or stuff, and use any source you want for something. So basically these things all say they go back to their roots, saying "back to basics", "back to roots", etc shows that.[1][2][3][4][5] And rolling stone however does just simply call it nu metal though however.[6] But, these are all the sources. And korn's early work aka the roots of korn were nu metal,[7] however NME said "Nu metal founding fathers" which openly does indicate they pioneered it in their early years in 1992-1994.

2601:A:4100:5A:CD2B:B81B:3468:4006 (talk) 00:30, 14 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Sources edit

  1. ^ http://www.nme.com/reviews/korn/7246
  2. ^ http://www.melodic.net/?page=review&id=1728
  3. ^ http://www.review-o-matic.com/?p=350
  4. ^ http://www.musicomh.com/albums/korn.htm
  5. ^ http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,556194,00.html
  6. ^ http://www.rollingstone.com/music/albumreviews/take-a-look-in-the-mirror-20031202
  7. ^ McIver, Joel (2002). "How Did We Get to Nu-Metal from Old Metal?". Nu-Metal: The Next Generation of Rock & Punk. Omnibus Press. pp. 10, 12. ISBN 0-7119-9209-6.