This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
I'd be interested in who brought the prosecution, in what is known about their expressed or imputed reasons for doing so, in what organisations appeared to hold influence - if they were elected who paid their campaign expenses, if they were re-elected ditto. I'd be interested in the arguments, in short summary, and reasoning. I'd be interested in the parallel if any with the Lady Chatterley's Lover trial - the DH Lawrence novel - in the UK, which changed the boundaries on mass publishing of print material, and allowed one's servants to read all sorts of stuff... I live a long way away, and am not in a good position to actually dig that out and write the article myself, so here are some suggestions. I'm also interested in where the people involved got to after, and perhaps in what they (say they) think about it. Midgley (talk) 12:22, 1 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
