Talk:Demographics of Hispanic and Latino Americans

Changes

I changed a couple of very important things. First it should be noted that there is no consensus on which term (Hispanic or Latino) should be used so the most neutral option is to use both (see: Hispanic/Latino naming dispute). I also changed the following sentence which is rubbish: "It is estimated that in two generations, the United States will have the second largest Latino population following Mexico". "Latino", as every critical and intelligent person knows is not a synonym of Latin American. Both terms refer to two different groups. See the following sources:

• "The very term Latino has meaning only in reference to the U.S. experience. Outside the United States, we don't speak of Latinos; we speak of Mexicans, Cubans, Puerto Ricans, and so forth. Latinos are made in the USA". Marcelo Suarez-Orozco, Mariela Páez, Latinos: Remaking America (University of California Press, 2008) ISBN 0520258274 Page 4</ref>

• Latino is a U.S. construct

• The concept of “Latino” is an American concept

• Being Latino is an American identity

• For the U.S. government and others, Hispanic or Latino identity is voluntary, as in the United States Census, and in some market research

• “Latino” is a self-designated term by members of different subgroups

• Spanish/Hispanic/Latino is a self-designated classification</ref>

Please, next time use "Latino", "Hispanic" and "Latin American" properly.--Scandza (talk) 14:21, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

ADMIXTURE OF HISPANICS IN U.S REGARDLESS OF SELF IDENTIFIED RACE

To Erikeltic-

This article is about Hispanics and Latino Americans in the U.S regardless of self identified race, what possible reason could you have to remove a admixture study of Hispanics in the U.S regardless of self identified race?--ChineseNygirl (talk) 17:05, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

To Erikeltic - what are you not getting? this is an article about Latinos and Hispanics of any race, the admixture study is about Hispanics of any race--ChineseNygirl (talk) 17:42, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Once again--and I am the 4th editor to point this out to you--your citations do not support the statements you are attempting to insert into this [and other] articles. I recommend you familiarize yourself with Wikipedia editing policies, including WP:IRS, WP:BRD, and WP:POINT before you continue with your disruptive editing. In addition, you need to remember that if you violate 3RR again you may face both a significantly longer block and/or possibly a topic ban from this subject. I strongly urge you to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia policy before continuing this behavior. Erikeltic ^(Talk) 17:41, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

If you read the link you would see it confirms what I say. --ChineseNygirl (talk) 17:48, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

You may want to read WP:Syn as well, as you are drawing conclusions about the entire United States population based off of the results in California. Erikeltic ^(Talk) 17:52, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

I said Hispanics of California and Hispanics of the U.S, whats wrong with you?--ChineseNygirl (talk) 17:58, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

You have not even bothered to read the citations or else you would see it was not just a study of California.--ChineseNygirl (talk) 18:00, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

You have now reverted the article three times and are again in violation of 3RR. You have also apparently lost the ability to be civil. Your citations do not support the inclusion of this material. However, I will not violate 3RR or continue in an edit war with you. I will simply report your behavior and you will find yourself topic banned for these activities. You have a great deal of passion and I hope that while you are banned you will familiarize yourself with Wikipedia policies and become a helpful contributor. That being said, I am finished having this conversation with you. Erikeltic ^(Talk) 18:03, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

I hope you are reading this while you are on your block break. When you come back, rather than insert your WP:SYN into this and other articles to prove your WP:POINT, please go to the talk page first and engage your fellow editors. Aside from the fact that your citations do not support your claims, please use the talk page to first explain to [all of] us exactly why you feel it is necessary to include DNA percentage rates within an article about Hispanics. Again, forgetting the fact that your citations do not support what you're including without a lot of WP:SYN, your inclusions have nothing whatsoever to do with the content of the article. Your edits certainly have nothing to do with the population rates of Hispanics of the United States, which is where you continue to place this unwanted and unsourced material. The bottom line is that not only are your edits poorly written and do not read well, they detract from the article and are not supported by your own citations without using the process of WP:SYN. Please read WP:BRD before making any additional edits on this topic. You may find it very helpful. Erikeltic ^(Talk) 20:00, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Problems with the demographic table of the US Hispanic population

As I figured (adding the number of Hispanics in each state according to the demographic table in article), the number of Hispanics and Latino Americans in United States in 2010 was of 50,141,364 people. In 2010 Census the number of Hispanics and Latino Americans surpassed really the 50 million people... But these 50,141,364 Hispanics and Latino Americans excluded the number the people of Puerto Rico and Hispanics of the U.S Virgin Islands (I did not added them to the sum): With they, the number of Hispanos and Latinos would surpass the 53 millions of people. In other words, they were more of 50 millions in 2010 Census but including only those who live in the states that are part of United States, excluding the people of Puerto Rico and Hispanics of the U.S Virgin Islands.--Isinbill (talk) 19:53, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Demographics of Hispanic and Latino Americans. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100902101116/http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/DTTable?_bm=y&-ds_name=ACS_2007_1YR_G00_&-mt_name=ACS_2007_1YR_G2000_B03002&-CONTEXT=dt&-redoLog=true&-currentselections=PEP_2006_EST_G2006_T004_2006&-geo_id=01000US&-format=&-_lang=en to http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/DTTable?_bm=y&-ds_name=ACS_2007_1YR_G00_&-mt_name=ACS_2007_1YR_G2000_B03002&-CONTEXT=dt&-redoLog=true&-currentselections=PEP_2006_EST_G2006_T004_2006&-geo_id=01000US&-format=&-_lang=en
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100910002417/http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/DTTable?_bm=y&-ds_name=PEP_2007_EST&-mt_name=PEP_2007_EST_G2007_T004_2007&-CONTEXT=dt&-redoLog=true&-currentselections=PEP_2006_EST_G2006_T004_2006&-geo_id=01000US&-format=&-_lang=en to http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/DTTable?_bm=y&-ds_name=PEP_2007_EST&-mt_name=PEP_2007_EST_G2007_T004_2007&-CONTEXT=dt&-redoLog=true&-currentselections=PEP_2006_EST_G2006_T004_2006&-geo_id=01000US&-format=&-_lang=en

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:35, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Demographics of Hispanic and Latino Americans. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/releases/archives/population/010482.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110429214029/http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-02.pdf to http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-02.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:50, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Demographics of Hispanic and Latino Americans. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/releases/archives/facts_for_features_special_editions/010327.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130210025647/http://stthomassource.com/content/news/local-news/2013/02/05/us-census-shows-vi-aging-growing-more-hispanic to http://stthomassource.com/content/news/local-news/2013/02/05/us-census-shows-vi-aging-growing-more-hispanic

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:36, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Demographics of Hispanic and Latino Americans. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131020161648/http://2010.census.gov/news/press-kits/redistricting.html to http://2010.census.gov/news/press-kits/redistricting.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131020161648/http://2010.census.gov/news/press-kits/redistricting.html to http://2010.census.gov/news/press-kits/redistricting.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:13, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

with a longer life expectancy than their fellow Americans

Tell to whites "stop over-eating that shit!"

we need to elaborate on the US diet