Talk:Delta Psi (University of Vermont)
 | Delta Psi (University of Vermont) was nominated as a Social sciences and society good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (July 8, 2015). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
 | A fact from Delta Psi (University of Vermont) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 February 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
GA Review edit
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Delta Psi (University of Vermont)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Wugapodes (talk · contribs) 03:33, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Checklist edit
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
- some contractions that you may want to clean up but it's not required.
- B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
- Lead is too short and does not adequately summarize the contents of the article. See WP:Lead. Also see comment 5 below
- A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- B. Cites reliable sources, where necessary:
- Direct quotations require inline attribution after them so that they can be properly verified
- C. No original research:
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- It may be that sources are limited but the article feels rather short, as if information or other aspects of the organization could be expanded upon. Though as the organization is rather small, I could understand a lack of sources or activity. Feel free to advise me on this.
- B. Focused (see summary style):
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- see comment 4 below
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Comments edit
- 1. Delta Psi's new facility was a magnificent Queen Anne structure built in 1882 by deceased Burlington businessman Edward Wells. Magnificent here seems a little non-neutral. The description is enough; readers should determine for themselves whether it is magnificent or not.
- 2. That year, several members were arrested during what university officials described as a hazing incident in which it was alleged[...] You should add a citation here, to be on the safe side, as it seems mildly controversial and, as it occurred in 2003, may involve living people which means it should probably be source.
- 3. It's also been speculated... by whom?
- 4. UVM Williams Hall picture is not related to the topic beyond both being related to UVM. Was the organization founded in Williams Hall? Were ceremonies held there? What does the picture provide beyond mere decoration?
- (Optional) Text sandwiched between two images doesn't look very good, but WP:IMAGES compliance isn't required.
Result edit
On hold for 7 days pending the changes suggested. Depending on progress, an extension may be given. If you have questions or comments about anything feel free to ask. Wugapodes (talk) 04:36, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Delta Psi (University of Vermont). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://info.libraries.vermont.gov/supct/current/op2007-386.html - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141213061113/http://www.vtcynic.com/2014/09/new-fraternity-to-join-uvm/ to http://www.vtcynic.com/2014/09/new-fraternity-to-join-uvm/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:49, 10 December 2016 (UTC)