This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's Health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HealthTemplate:WikiProject Women's Healthwomen's health articles
Just to be clear, this section is logical, and the article it cites in NEJM is good science, but the unstated but reasonable conclusion that "somebody" thinks degarelix may have wider applicability is entirely speculative. I edited several fact errors and also adjusted the style somewhat. I find the NEJM article fascinating and under WP:IAR I think it enhances WP, but the literalist reality is that this material doesn't conform to WP:MEDRS, and would benefit from a good secondary source citation to back it up. FeatherPluma (talk) 05:43, 9 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
