Talk:Defence CBRN Centre

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: British / European C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

Wiltshire Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wiltshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wiltshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WiltshireWikipedia:WikiProject WiltshireTemplate:WikiProject WiltshireWiltshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge

Latest comment: 7 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

There seems little to say about this facility, so I propose it be merged (with a redirect) to Winterbourne Gunner. Rodhull andemu 21:50, 5 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Weak argument, redirect means only you think it is irrelevant.Cantab1985 (talk) 13:24, 17 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

One second thoughts, merge all you want.Cantab1985 (talk) 02:58, 18 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Disagree the centre is notable and since it's tri service their should be more information out there and the article gets a fair few hits every day. Gavbadger (talk) 13:21, 18 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic