This article was nominated for deletion on 18 February 2013. The result of the discussion was speedy keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology articles
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I've removed the section on David Pilbeam's Deanship and instead included a shorter paragraph in the main section of the article. I feel this makes the article a bit more balanced. I've also cited the Harvard Crimson. The old section used loaded phrases, such as, "was marred by," and was unsourced. -Thucydides411 (talk) 20:42, 17 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
There's an oft-quoted paragraph used by creationists suggesting that Dr. Pilbeam portrayed the field of human evolution as quackery, usually sourced to the American Scientist. Any veracity to this?52.119.105.14 (talk) 23:04, 5 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
,_early_1900s,_Central_Africa,_Democratic_Republic_of_the_Congo,_Pende_people,_wood,_fiber_-_Cleveland_Museum_of_Art_-_DSC08700.JPG){kind=small}