Talk:David H. Murdock
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
New Source edit
This is a new source of a lot of biographical info... http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/06/magazine/06murdock-t.html?pagewanted=1&_r=2 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.235.185.181 (talk) 01:43, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
Untitled edit
He joined the service then he became CEO? what happened in between? --Kraftlos (talk) 22:38, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
COI notice edit
In this edit with the summary "Improved layout" the COI tasg was removed from the article. Does anyone have a view on whether the tag remains justified? In any case when removing such tags, the edit summary should so indicate, and discussion on the talk page is often a very good idea. DES (talk) 17:05, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
Genealogical Chart edit
Really? does it serve any purpose other than, perhaps, inviting possible claimants to his fortune to get through the door? there is no one of note and the chart itself does not go very far. Is keeping this chart in going to set a precedent for other entries - is it Wikipedia's intention to be not just an encyclopedia but also a haven for genealogical research?```` — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.147.111.85 (talk) 16:49, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
- Concur, I've removed it. Lankiveil (speak to me) 12:59, 5 March 2015 (UTC).