Talk:David Berkeley
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the David Berkeley article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Common Rotation
editI saw David playing in the UK. CR played a handful of songs first, then DB came on and played a full set with CR joining him for two songs. If you ask me, they supported him.
- I suppose they alternated - in Glasgow David played a short set and CR played a long one after him. I'll update the article with a half-way expression. McMarcoP (talk) 08:02, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
Criticism
editWhy is there so much 'criticism' of the artist? I'm not too familiar with him, but he is neither a politician or fringe scientist, making the inclusion of this section bizzare, especially given how much space it takes up proportional to the article as a whole. Honestly reads like someone with a personal vendetta is filling David's article with unecessary negative information. I suggest removing it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.111.223.101 (talk) 22:07, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
- Actually I added it and I am a huge fan (and a friend of David's as well), I just thought that some should be mentioned for the sake of completeness. Please be aware that most of it - as specified in the section - is hinted to in generically positive reviews. I will re-edit that section anyway. McMarcoP (talk) 08:54, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
- OK, I removed the section and integrated the information there included in the rest of the article. McMarcoP (talk) 09:13, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
Apart from making an unnecessarily desperate case for Berkeley's inclusion in Wikipedia, this tellingly named "critical appreciation" section is an obvious exercise in cherry-picking and fails to preserve NPOV. That critics have favorably compared him to better known musicians seems to me an objective statement of fact, but balancing all the thumbs-ups and thumbs-downs is a hopelessly subjective exercise and seems inappropriate for an encyclopedia entry. 69.217.194.205 (talk) 06:25, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
- Well, dear anonymous user, I tried to mention ALL the opinions given about David Berkeley by the various critics that I could find and source, and the positive reviews are many more than the negative ones. Every artist will fatally attract some negative comments, I guess it is one of the main risks of the profession, and for objectivity's sake I did report those I could find. The "Cleveland" reference might be little more than a curiosity, but I consider the observation about his ironic attitude between songs during his live shows quite relevant. Personally, I like his style - but the quoted article criticises it and I'd insist in keeping such observation in there. I like David Berkeley, but refusing to mention that some people might not appreciate this or that aspect of his style would be, in my opinion, exactly what you mention - a failure to preserve NPOV. McMarcoP (talk) 08:35, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
Assessment request
editI will leave this at C-Class for now, because per the B-Class criteria it's not there yet, especially regarding a proper lead section that summarizes the article. Any editor can feel free to relist the article once this is addressed. Hekerui (talk) 10:23, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you for your time! McMarcoP (talk) 12:23, 26 April 2011 (UTC)