Talk:David A. Noebel

Untitled

I changed "Today, countless Christian youth have fallen victim to the popular ideas of our modern world. Most have adopted these ideas into their own worldview, while still others go on to renounce their Christian faith altogether." to "He believes that today, countless Christian youth have fallen victim to the popular ideas of our modern world, and that most have adopted these ideas into their own worldview, while still others go on to renounce their Christian faith altogether." 192.59.23.137 (talk) 17:28, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

December 2009

I have read two of Noebel's books, The Marxist Minstrels and The Legacy of John Lennon, and skimmed some of his others. They are textbook examples of logical fallacies (straw-man and ad hominem in particular) taken to the extreme, while Noebel himself "preaches to the choir" and appears to count more on his reading audience's naiveté than their knowledge or reasoning skills. Marxist Minstrels in particular is a hoot on many levels, in its attempts to posit the Beatles, Bob Dylan and other popular musicians as the leaders (consciously or unconsciously) of a supposed movement to soften up young fans of pop and rock music to accept hardline Communism, or recruit them to the Communist cause. (It gets even funnier with the perspective of history.)

Noebel's "exposés" consist largely of quotes taken out of context (some selectively edited or "bleeped", to support his points), equivocation (such as presenting a John Lennon quote, "If people can't face up to the fact of other people being naked or smoking pot, then we're never going to get anywhere", as a call by Lennon for everyone to go around naked and use marijuana), composition (if one member of a group did something, then they all must have done it, and wanted their followers to do likewise) and guilt by association, appeals to authority (Reverend Whatsit said it about them, therefore it must be true, because Reverend Whatsit wouldn't lie), false dilemmas (since so-and-so never issued a statement against something, they are obviously for it), treating offhand remarks as formal declarative statements and temporary situations as permanent conditions, and the like. (The Marxist Minstrels spent about as many pages discussing Bob Dylan's bathing habits in his prefame days as it did discussing his expressed beliefs later.)

Noebel does make extensive use of footnotes... but his later books tend to cite (and thereby plug) his earlier ones, while the earlier ones cite sources that don't support his claims when viewed in context. In trying to check his research, I discovered something interesting, through a phone call to his office: I was told that Noebel has a habit of throwing away his notes and materials once his manuscripts are complete, so it's not surprising that he would turn to his own extant works (rather than re-examine source materials) as sources for quotes and information.

While none of the foregoing is usable in a Wikipedia sense (as original research), it may provide a starting point for someone to possibly expose the "exposer" at a future date. I only wish I had the time. Zephyrad (talk) 06:42, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Add a recording link

Would anyone who understands Wikipedia and this article care to add a recording which captures Noebel's thinking and style:

http://archive.org/details/DavidNoebel-MarxistMinstrelsCommunistSubversionOfAmericanFolkMusic

EdRicardo (talk) 12:18, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Check for POV

Particularly in the beginning, the text seems to puff this gentleman up quite a bit, and the sources are really weak. Haven't there been any writers or reporters who have done a better job in assessing this man? BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 21:28, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on David A. Noebel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091023074301/http://www.secularhumanism.org/library/fi/review_21_3.html to http://www.secularhumanism.org/library/fi/review_21_3.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090830071450/http://www.summit.org/resources/av/radio/2008/03/when_professors_become_digress.php to http://www.summit.org/resources/av/radio/2008/03/when_professors_become_digress.php
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071010053116/http://www.secularhumanism.org/library/fi/grothe_22_3.htm to http://www.secularhumanism.org/library/fi/grothe_22_3.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071028103854/http://www.christianworldviewnetwork.com/bio.php/10/David_Noebel to http://www.christianworldviewnetwork.com/bio.php/10/David_Noebel

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:15, 19 January 2018 (UTC)