This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of the Women in Religion WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Women in religion. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Women in ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject Women in ReligionTemplate:WikiProject Women in ReligionWomen in Religion articles
VocalIndia, oh, and it definitely is a notable topic, imho. So please have patience. There are a lot of other articles which mention this demon, and once the copyvio thing is figured out, it would be good to link those other articles to this page. Onel5969TT me17:03, 1 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
The two links given are definitely copying Wikipedia and not the other way round. The site at [1] is filled with stuff copied from Wikipedia (e.g. [2] is blatantly copying Keibul Lamjao National Park). [3] is dated June 2019, when the content was already in Nageshvara Jyotirlinga, so it's not taken from there either. Looking through the edit history it looks like the content was developed incrementally in that article, which also strongly suggests it's not taken from an external source.
Technically the use of this text here is a copyright violation because the licence Wikipedia uses requires you to attribute the authors of the text. If you copy from another article you have to attribute the source of the content as explained in WP:CWW. I've done that for this article. Hut 8.518:38, 1 October 2020 (UTC)Reply