This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles
Latest comment: 8 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This section feels like it's been written by someone who's only intent is to diminish danger mouse. I feel the person either doesn't like the cartoon or wasn't even alive at the time. For example, what has the all time popularity of characters on Channel 4 have to do with how popular danger mouse was at the time of it's showing? Absolutely none that's what, the Simpsons also used in this section to imply danger mouse wasn't that popular wasn't even airing at the time the original danger mouse series was, so mentioning the simpsons is irrelevant to any context.
Now I don't know the actual figures of the shows popularity in terms of how many viewers it had, but I see absolutely no relevance or need to the "debunking" of the 21 million figure here, just state what the believed figures were in an objective assessment, rather than what appears to be a somewhat hate filled anti danger mouse section filled with strawman irrelevances. 94.175.102.211 (talk) 10:55, 30 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
