Talk:Damp proofing

Engineering Low‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Text and/or other creative content from Damp-proof course was copied or moved into Damp proofing with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Merger_proposal

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Seems pretty obvious that Damp proofing and Damp-proof course should be merged 82.46.49.45 (talk) 13:47, 21 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

I agree. CharlesSpencer (talk) 16:28, 25 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Is rising damp common?

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The article states: "In practise, Rising Damp almost never occurs.". In the same time, the article "Damp (structural)" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Damp_%28structural%29#Rising_damp) states that rising damp is one of the "big three" causes of damp in buildings.

Maybe someone with knowledge on the subject could clarify and/or correct it? Thanks a lot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.109.140.136 (talk) 08:28, 27 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Re: Merging

Remember that a course (in context of building) is a single row of bricks and adjacent mortar. A damproof course is where the mortar course is partly or wholly replaced by some matter that resists water movement.

Damp-proofing (in the context of building) is something entirely different. I could go on with many examples but suffice to provide 2. You can put a layer of plastic under a concrete slab to "damp proof" it. You can treat the walls of a cellar to keep out damp and /or groundwater to "damp proof" it. Neither of these processes are "a damp proof course". Have a look at http://www.nationaltrusttas.org.au/aftermac/young/young.htm and many other similar documents. Rising damp is a major problem in heritage buildiongs. Oaec (talk) 00:47, 10 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Marked for Excessive Advocacy

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article reads somewhat like an opinion piece. Parts of the construction section are copied directly from http://www.keyline.co.uk/Products/Damp-Proofing Cjeam (talk) 10:32, 13 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Add topic