Talk:DICE model

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide

Economics Low‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Conclusions? edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article does not state any predictions or conclusions made from the model. What are they? — Loadmaster (talk) 20:19, 20 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Criticisms edit

There is quite a bit of criticism of DICE and how it has been used, for example, from Steve Keen, the Australian economist. It has been used to model the economic effects of climate change for the IPCC and the economic effects of environmental damage by the American EPA, from which policy decisions have been made. Therefore the existence of these criticisms should be included because of the far reaching decisions made on the basis of possibly faulty DICE models. See 'The Appallingly Bad Neoclassical Economics of Climate Change' at https://www.patreon.com/m/618839/posts . Hedley 05:18, 10 June 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hfinger (talk • contribs)

Add topic