Talk:Cyclones Vardah and ARB 02

This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Weather: Tropical / North Indian Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the North Indian Ocean work group (assessed as Low-importance).

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Depression ARB 02 edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Shouldn't we just merge the ARB 02 section into this article? I don't see it necessary to list it as a separate storm, and the lead could say "Cyclone Vardah (also known as Depression ARB 02 after it regenerated in the Arabian Sea)..." etc. --MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 18:47, 17 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

The RSMC for the basin i.e. the IMD treats Vardah and ARB 02 as two separate systems as seen from their different designations, so it is necessary to list them separately though we could include a note about how the JTWC says otherwise. ~ KN2731 {talk} 12:42, 18 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

JTWC portion edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Considering the JTWC says Vardah was a TS in the Arabian Sea, should the article be expanded to reflect that? --MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 23:30, 15 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Bumping and pinging @Cyclonebiskit: for this after like a month. --MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 22:36, 19 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic